Archive for the 'Republican' Category

Don’t Blink

This Saturday morning, July 23rd, the Senate was originally scheduled to vote on Cut, Cap and Balance, the Republican plan to cut $111 billion out of this year’s deficit, trim $4 trillion over ten years, and present a balanced budget amendment to the states.  Instead, Harry Reid moved the vote up to Friday morning, calling it a waste of time and the worst piece of legislation to ever come to the Senate floor.  It failed to pass on strict partisan lines.

Senator Schumer called the bill “Cut, Cap and Kill” because he insisted that the bill would kill Medicare.  Debbie Wasserman-Schultz declared in the House of Representatives that the bill would kill seniors and that it was the Paul Ryan plan on steroids.   The only problem is that in three different places Cut, Cap and Balance specifically exempted Medicare and Social Security from cuts and caps.  Had Republicans known, some of them might have been a little bit more up in arms about the bill.  It was actually a very good compromise.  It cut and cap wasteful spending on liberal social programs and government bureaucracy, not hot buttons like military, Social Security and Medicare.

Perhaps that is a more reasonable explanation of why Harry Reid went back on his promise to allow debate on Cut, Cap and Balance and instead moved the vote up.  Perhaps someone in the Senate actually read the bill and told Reid what was in it.  And then, as if scripted, suddenly news outlets started declaring a deal between Boehner and Obama that was so close Reid needed to get this bill off the floor and stop “wasting time” on it.  The only problem is there was no such deal.  Somebody was lying to provide the sense of urgency needed to cut off debate on Cut, Cap and Balance before it got out that Democrats were lying about it killing Medicare.

This has become the name of the game in budget talks.  Neither side is willing to give in because both sides know that 2012 elections hang in the balance.  The difference is that Republicans have actually gone so far as to write a good compromise bill.  Democrats can’t vote yes on it, not because it “kills Medicare” or kills seniors.  They can’t vote on it because passing Cut, Cap and Balance would destroy Democrat re-election hopes for 2012.  It would be a huge Republican victory because Republicans came up with it.

On the other hand, Democrats can’t write a plan of their own.  They haven’t submitted a budget in over 800 days, and they can’t submit one now or that will also destroy their chances of getting re-elected in 2012.  Democrats can’t write a bill that says “We want to raise taxes so that we don’t have to cut spending as much” and still win in 2012 because the vast majority of the country doesn’t want Democrats to raise taxes so that they can spend more.  They are spending enough already, and we are taxed enough already.  On the other hand, Democrats can’t write a plan saying “Ok, no higher taxes, just cuts” or they will lose their class warfare base.  The liberal base of the Democrat party does not want a bill that doesn’t raise taxes on the “rich”.  It’s not about raising revenue, it’s about punishing upper classes more.

Republicans submitted a plan and it was a good plan.  Obama has signaled that he is willing to let the country default on its debt rather than compromise with Republicans.  Democrats have proven that they are the party of no on a budget deal.  If Republicans end up caving in order to save our credit rating, I hope Americans get the right message.  It doesn’t mean Republicans are wimps and we need to get rid of them.  It means they can only do so much with just a majority in the House.  We need to give them the Senate and the Presidency in 2012 if we expect anything to get accomplished.

Scott Sinks Obama’s Titanic

Return to sender.  That was Governor Rick Scott’s response to Obama’s offer of $2.4 billion in borrowed stimulus funds to create 48,000 green energy jobs through the construction of European style high speed rail connecting the sprawling cities of Tampa and Orlando.

Scott’s decision was attacked immediately by the administration, Bill Nelson, Corrine Brown, and others, while poorly managed, broke states like California quickly started begging for the funds.  I knew right then Scott made the right decision.  Scott was also sued bipartisanly by Florida state politicians, but the Florida Supreme Court ruled in Scott’s favor yesterday, effectively killing high speed rail.

So why would I be so happy about the state writing void on the Fed’s $2.4 billion check and mailing it back?  Because if you look beyond the pile of green, all you can see is red.

Every politician and newspaper (depending on what Florida city it is from) has their own math for calculating the costs.  The government estimates that after Obama’s check for $2.4 billion, the state would have to either fund or find private investors to pick up another $280 million.

Then there is the unanticipated costs of figuring out whose property needs to be bought in order to lay the rail. Scott’s own team of advisers refigured the costs  of the project based on the realities of California’s own experiment with high speed rail and found the Federal estimates to be a little optimistic, to the tune of another $3 billion dollars. Experts have also balked at government estimates of ridership.

One issue I see with ridership that not many are talking about is the size of the destination cities.  I have been to Tampa and Orlando.  They are not walking around cities.  Once riders arrive in either city, they will need to secure local transportation.  If it were me, I would prefer to have my car once I got to either destination.  Obama, coming from Chicago and sitting in his office in DC, might think there is a large market for commuters between the two Florida cities.  Having driven the rush hours between them, I don’t see it.

For Scott, this decision to cancel delivery on the Obama golden goose may also stem from the budget battle he is preparing to have in Florida’s capital.  Scott is being accused of getting ready to cut $3 billion in education in Florida.  But the reality is that Scott is simply refusing to continue paying the obligation that the Federal Government created with unfunded stimulus money last year.  He is not changing Florida’s budget for education.  It would be like deciding not to include one time lottery winnings in your future monthly budget.

Obama’s stimulus was designed to put broke states on the hook for higher spending on a social agenda that the Federal Government couldn’t even afford when they passed the stimulus bill.  It was a bill designed to change America, create jobs for the sake solely of creating jobs with no sustainability, and set up a monumental legacy to Obama of green energy and government control.  The President did not count on voters demanding fiscal responsibility.

But what about the 48,000 potential jobs lost that this $2.4 billion was going to secure for us?  Fortunately Scott has a better plan.  Instead of spending $280 million to $3 billion in state funds on a redundant transportation system between two cities, Scott is requesting $77 million to dredge Miami’s port so that they can start receiving larger ships from the expanding Panama Canal and expand trade with Asia.  It is a project that will create 30,000 jobs and an agenda that will expand to Jacksonville’s Jaxport with likely the same results.

It is an idea that trades legacy building and big government agenda with private enterprise and economic growth.  And it saves the government about $55,500 per job created.

Shut it down

Memories of 1995 haunt GOP as shutdown talks grow. At least that’s the headline.  But why should the 1995 shutdown haunt the GOP?  Republicans shut down the government in order to force liberal Democrat President Bill Clinton to take a sharp turn to the right and balance the budget.  Clinton has been taking credit for it ever since as though somehow balancing the budget was his idea.  You still hear people (who haven’t read my blog) tout the “Clinton surplus”.  Of course, if you read my blog, you know there never was a surplus.

But Republicans did cause Clinton to drastically drop spending and usher in a period of pretty good economic growth for our country.  It started with a government shut down.

Why should a shutdown haunt the GOP?  Democrat senators in Wisconsin seem to think a government shut down is a pretty good idea.  Maybe if the Senate in DC won’t pass the House’s budget, Senate GOP members should go hide in Illinois with the Wisconsin Democrats.

We are about to head into our third deficit in excess of $1 trillion in a row.  In fact, this one is a brand new record of $1.65 trillion.  Someone needs to put the brakes on.  Especially since Obama’s idea of putting on the breaks is to have one deficit as low as $607 billion over the next ten years.  Bush held the previous deficit record at $458 billion for one of his 8 years in office.  Obama has dwarfed Bush’s entire deficit twice already and is on track to do it again.

Obama doesn’t even have a stimulus bill or healthcare law as an excuse this year.  This deficit is simply government spending beyond its means.

Republicans trimmed a tame $61 billion out of the budget, and Dems have labeled them as oppressive, murdering extortionists.  If the GOP doesn’t take drastic measures, by the time Obama leaves office it would take one year of every American paying 100% of every dollar they make in taxes just to cover his deficits.

Clinton managed to take credit for the results of the 1995 government shut down while demonizing Republicans for it.  The grass roots conservative movements who sent the GOP back in 2010 are ready for a shut down.  the question is if Republicans can speak louder than Obama and the media make sure credit is given where credit is due when it works.

Looking For Loonies In All The Wrong Places

I predicted it as soon as I read the headline about the AZ shooter. The media was going to label him an extreme right wing activist, upset about healthcare or spending or Obama’s birth certificate, or some other right wing cause. I also predicted they would be wrong. I wasn’t the only one who saw their slant coming.  They don’t have the best track record on these things. Actually, considering Paul Krugman’s admission that the left was just waiting for this to happen, I wouldn’t be surprised if the media had the story pre-written, just waiting to enter the date and location. But once again they were disappointed.

For example, remember the angry TEA Partier who flew his plane into the IRS building? Except wait, he was a George Bush hater upset about the war and how the IRS was coming after him for unpaid taxes. Or how about angry TEA Partier who went to the Discovery channel and held hostages because they are part of the hated leftwing media and show videos about evolution? No wait, James Lee was an extreme leftist eco-terrorist who had watched Al Gore’s movie and wanted to help control the population to stop Global Warming. He was also pro-abortion.  What about the TEA Partier who tried to set off a bomb in Times Square?  Wasn’t he upset about the healthcare bill?  That’s what Mayor Bloomberg automatically assumed.  Turns out the bomber was a Muslim extremist.  The only people who were surprised were the left and the media.

Between James Lee and the Unibomber, with their Al Gore literature and movies, it reminds me of Mel Gibson in the movie Conspiracy Theory. Perhaps whenever the CIA wants to find a crazy person, they just have them buy a copy of “An Inconvenient Truth”.

If you want an interesting read, check out the NY Times version of Jared Loughner.  On page 1 of the article, we learn that Loughner “…became an echo chamber for stray ideas, amplifying, for example, certain grandiose tenets of a number of extremist right-wing groups — including the need for a new money system and the government’s mind-manipulation of the masses through language.”

Excuse me, what?  How many “right-wing extremists” do you know who believe the government is manipulating their minds through language?  I think the greater insight into Jared Loughner can be found on page 3 of the story.

“He became intrigued by antigovernment conspiracy theories, including that the Sept. 11 attacks were perpetrated by the government and that the country’s central banking system was enslaving its citizens. His anger would well up at the sight of President George W. Bush, or in discussing what he considered to be the nefarious designs of government.”

That sounds more like Rosie O’Donnell than a right-wing extremist!  In fact, the 9/11 conspiracy seems to be about as popular as works by Al Gore among recent violent extremists.

Of course, when the left talks about hate speech, they generally are talking about disagreeing with Obama. Rarely do they admit hate speech when leftists were carrying Bush as Hitler signs or when Kanye West said Bush didn’t care about black people, or how about Rosie O’Donnell spreading the myth that Bush and the government killed 3,000 people on 9/11.  Krugman’s own admission of his prejudice against TEA Partiers is very revealing.

Of course, Krugman is one of those special sort of intellectuals who believes a nation’s wealth should be measured by the depth of its government’s coffers.  He also seems to believe that if you borrow a million dollars that makes you a millionaire.  But he, like Al Gore, Barack Obama, and Yassar Arafat, has won a Nobel prize so he must be some sort of reliable authority.

From the Democrats at Westboro Baptist, the Muslim shooter at Ft Hood (remember? The President said to not jump to conclusions), to the extreme left leaning whackos like Lee and now Loughner, I think we can start making some assumptions of our own. If the media fails to mention political party, religion, or conservative/liberal when someone goes off the deep end, or if they accuse them of being a TEA Partier, we can assume the opposite.

Now Palin is being criticized for responding to her critics, who had basically charged her with murder. She apparently used language that the Anti-Defamation league thought would be “painful” to WWII survivors. Where was the Anti-Defamation league when Dick Durbin accused our troops of using tactics like Nazi prison camps or Soviet Gulags?

Well, it turns out the real hate speech in America is having an effect. You can now see a compilation of assassination threats against Sarah Palin posted on Youtube. Obama warned us to not accuse each other and not turn on each other during times like this, but his warning came out only after it was discovered that Loughner was a crazy left-leaning druggie.

And despite Obama’s warning, one of the shooting victims made his own death threat against conservative activist Trent Humphries at an ABCNews organized townhall just days later.  Between the conspiracies, accusations and assumptions, perhaps the left and media should do some self examination before they unwittingly produce the next Jared Loughner.

Obama’s big win of 2010:extending Bush’s biggest win of 2001

Victory, Immortal Fame!  So cries the last warrior standing, ironically right before he himself dies, after defeating his surrounding army.  The warriors of the mythical army, raised from serpent’s teeth planted in the ground, are tricked by Jason into battling each other.  So ends this humorous battle in Argonautica.

Not so different was the media coverage of the passing of the Bush tax cut extension.  After Obama defeated his fellow Democrats in passing this extension, the media hailed it as a much needed victory for the White House.

Wait.  What?

If you read Obama’s Tax Cuts of 2010, you shouldn’t be too  surprised.  In fact, the only thing that should surprise you is exactly how much of the Republican agenda Obama acquiesced to in this tax rate extension.  I predicted back in October, 2009 that Obama would extend the Bush tax cuts for at least the middle class, and that he would herald them as tax cuts instead of merely extensions of the Bush tax rates.  But at the time I figured it would come at the cost of no estate tax fix, higher rates for upper income earners, and other built in tax hikes.  Instead, this “White House victory” looks more like something from the last 8 years that supposedly “got us into this mess in the first place”.

The question then, if this is truly a White House victory, is if Obama has become a born again Capitalist.  The tax extension doesn’t just extend Bush tax rates for two years, it also gives a generous estate tax system that increases the exemption from $1 million to $5 million and lowers rates to 35%.  It also gives businesses of any size 100% bonus depreciation on new asset purchases in a tax gift to huge corporations.  And lastly, it replaces the Making Work Pay Credit with a 2% across the board cut in Social Security taxes.

The 2% Social Security cut was Obama’s answer to the expiring Making Work Pay Credit and is perhaps the greatest evidence of either a change of heart on Obama’s part, or a total victory on the Republican’s part.  In 2010, the Making Work Pay Credit will give families making less than $40,000 a credit of $800, while denying families making more than $175,000 any credit.  It was a perfect Liberal tax cut.  It was even poorly administrated.

On the other hand, the 2% Social Security cut is an across the board flat cut that is easy to administer and has no AGI cap.  So in 2011 a family that makes less than $40,000 will actually be paying more taxes, while a family with  a working husband and wife who make $200,000 combined will get a tax cut of $4,000.  This year they would have no tax break.  This non-progressive change is a White House victory?

The 2010 tax rate extension was an acknowledgment by the left that the policies of the last 8 years did not get us into this mess.  The Bush tax cuts got us out of the last mess and just might work this time too.  How they can claim that this Republican victory was anything else is beyond me.

The only thing the Democrats got out of this deal was not having to pay for the next unemployment benefits extension.  But in the end, Obama found it easier to defeat his own majority party than to take out the minority Republicans.  The result?  Your taxes aren’t going up next year no matter who you are.  And just as expected, Obama is saying it is because of him.

On Unemployment, Republicans are right and wrong

Get ready for the Sally Struthers commercials about to be produced by the DNC.  Republicans blocked an extension of unemployment benefits.

But what is being missed on a large scale is why Republicans blocked the extension.  Democrats have extended unemployment benefits four times and have not paid for any of the extensions.  In the most recent extension, they allowed people to find temporary work without losing benefits, all unpaid for.  With deficits over a trillion dollars, the Democrat argument has been that unemployment benefits create jobs.  I’m sure we can all come up with a time we were down on our luck and were hired by an unemployed person.  Right?

The Republican argument is simple.  Pay for the benefits, and they will vote to extend them.  In fact, since they are good Republicans, they don’t even want Democrats to cut other programs to pay for the benefits.  Simply take surpluses from Stimulus and TARP to pay for them.  Seems simple enough, but the Democrats appear to have local stimulus funded pork projects on their priority list above paying for unemployment benefits.  You won’t see that on their “Feed the Children of Detroit” tv special.

This one seems cut and dry.  But the Republicans are wrong too.  Saying you have a surplus in the stimulus program is like saying you have a surplus if you go shopping and don’t quite hit your credit limit.  The word “surplus” and “stimulus” (which was 100% in the red from day one) do not belong in the same sentence together.  Does it really matter which account we take the money from when every account is debt funded already?

Unemployment benefit extensions have become unregulated welfare.  No, unemployment benefits do not create jobs.  Businesses who are paid to create and produce goods and services that people want and need at prices they can afford create jobs.  But instead of throwing money at those job creators, we are raising taxes on them and telling them they can no longer conduct business.  A good example is Obama deciding we no longer need the energy independence that oil exploration and drilling would have provided.  That is thousands of jobs lost in his one decision.

Towards the beginning of Obama’s Presidency, he said that “There will be a time for profits, now is not that time”.  And that thinking is why Congress is looking for a fifth extension of unemployment benefits.

O’Donnell Dabbled in Witchcraft, Coons Bathed in Marxism

In a shocking revelation, brought to us by outspoken liberal Bill Maher and highlighted by outspoken Republican strategist Karl Rove, Christine O’Donnell admitted back in 1997 that she once dabbled in witchcraft.  This was of course before she became a born again Christian.  The unexpected Rove-Maher duo quickly jumped on the 13 year old interview, demanding explanations from O’Donnell.  Maher was overhead saying something about making sure you keep your children inside at night, lest she find them and sacrifice them.

O’Donnell, who was harshly attacked only last week for being too much of a fundamentalist Christian whacko, is now defending against attacks of satanism.  To make things even better, Maher has jumped on her ethical discussion of breaking God’s commandments against bearing false witness and is now portraying her as an anti-Semitic Nazi sympathizer who would betray Anne Frank to Hitler if given the opportunity.  I haven’t checked recently, are Nazi references still racist?

While the Rove-Maher political attack machine continued to go after the most evil candidate of our time, Chris Coons is running mostly undetected on the national stage.  Coons is O’Donnell’s Democrat opponent.

Coons also is a self-proclaimed Marxist.  Writing in a college paper, Coons described a trip to Kenya where he lost faith in America and capitalism and embraced Marxism.  It was at this point that he became a Democrat.  In fact, he writes about Kenya that “My friends now joke that something about Kenya, maybe the strange diet, or the tropical sun, changed my personality; Africa to them seems a catalytic converter that takes in clean-shaven, clear-thinking Americans and sends back bearded Marxists,”.

The Politico points out that this could spell trouble for Coons in the corporate friendly state of Delaware.  I suppose it would if anyone found out.  Stories of Coons’ Kenya conversion are near impossible to find now, especially with all the attention being paid to his insane, Hitleresque opponent from hell.

On the other hand, Kenyan Marxists have had some recent electoral success in the US.  In this race, he may do even better to embrace his transformation from a Reagan Conservative.

What’s that?  Yes, Marxist Coons once dabbled in Reagan Conservatism before his conversion to Marxism.  Don’t tell Karl Rove, he might go all Scozzafava on us.


Share This Blog

Bookmark and Share

Categories